Table of Contents
Modestus Louis Issues a Sharp Critique in Open Letter to Ex-SLP-Minister on Racism
Castries, Saint Lucia — April 14, 2024 — A former high-ranking police officer, Modestus Louis, has issued a scathing open letter condemning the racist remarks of Calixte George Sr., a former Minister of National Security under the Saint Lucia Labour Party Government. The letter, which surfaced on April 13, 2024, rebukes George for referring to Hon. Allen Chastanet as a “slave driver,” sparking widespread outrage across Saint Lucia.
The controversy erupted following Calixte George’s remarks in a public speech, which gained traction in political circles and on social media. The phrase “slave driver” has deep historical and racial connotations, and many have criticized it as a divisive and racially charged attack on Chastanet, a prominent political figure.
01
of 07Louis Fires Back in Open Letter
Louis, who has known George for more than five decades, responded with a sharply worded open letter defending Allen Chastanet while turning the accusation back on George himself. In his letter, Louis recalls his experiences working under George in the 1970s at the Union Agricultural Station, describing him as a harsh and feared boss, known among his subordinates as “The Spider.”
“You were a slave driver indeed,” Louis writes in the letter, accusing George of hypocrisy. He further criticizes George’s comments as not only misleading but also indicative of what he describes as a “shriveling soul chained by the bonds of wickedness, hatred, and jealousy.”
02
of 07Historical and Political Implications
The dispute underscores deeper tensions in Saint Lucian politics, where issues of race and historical sensitivities frequently resurface. The term “slave driver” is particularly contentious in the Caribbean, where the legacy of colonial oppression remains deeply ingrained in the national consciousness.
Critics argue that George’s remarks reflect a broader issue within the political landscape, where racial undertones are often weaponized for political gain. Louis contends that George’s statement aligns with what he describes as the SLP’s “plantation mindset”—a political philosophy he argues keeps citizens in a state of dependency rather than fostering self-reliance and empowerment.
According to Louis, George and the SLP are resistant to policies that promote economic independence for Saint Lucians. He suggests that Chastanet represents a new political movement that seeks to empower people, which he believes threatens the traditional political stronghold of George and his party.
03
of 07Sharp Criticism of SLP Governance
Beyond rebuking George’s comments, Louis’s letter takes a broader aim at the SLP’s political ideology. He accuses the party of maintaining a mendicant political culture, ensuring that citizens remain dependent on government assistance rather than being encouraged to achieve financial and social independence.
“The Labour Party is bent on creating a mendicant class who will depend on massa,” Louis writes. “Like the rest of your Animal Farm government, you do not want to see an empowered populace who can stand tall and think for themselves.”
This statement highlights a common critique of Saint Lucia’s political landscape, where accusations of political victimization and economic stagnation have been long-standing issues. Louis asserts that Chastanet and his leadership approach represent a break from this tradition, offering policies that could strengthen economic growth and individual prosperity.
04
of 07A Political Firestorm and Public Reaction
The letter has quickly gained traction across media platforms, prompting heated discussions on radio talk shows, social media, and political forums. Supporters of Louis praise him for calling out what they see as a pattern of racial division in political rhetoric, while critics argue that his response escalates tensions rather than resolving them.
Many have pointed out that this incident speaks to the larger issue of race and politics in Saint Lucia, where racial identity continues to influence public opinion and party allegiance. Some political analysts suggest that this controversy could shape upcoming political debates, as candidates may now be forced to address the role of racial rhetoric in their campaigns.
As public discourse intensifies, there is a growing call for politicians to adopt more responsible and unifying language to avoid further polarization.
05
of 07Full Text: Open Letter to Calixte George Sr.
Below is the full text of Modestus Louis’s open letter to Calixte George Sr., published on April 13, 2024:
06
of 07Open Letter to Calixte George Sr. on Recent Racist Remarks
Sir Calixte George Sr., Grande Riviere, Gros Islet
“In your recent offensive attack on Hon. Allen Chastanet, you labeled him a ‘slave driver’. Having known you for 50 years, I must openly state that you have exemplified the very behavior you now criticize. I first met you in August 1974 at the Union Agricultural Station. The staff, particularly the secretary, feared you, and you were widely known as ‘The Spider’, a testament to your demanding leadership style.
“Your recent remarks not only reflect poorly on you but also suggest a deep-seated malaise within your own character, one marred by jealousy and hatred. Your words did more to reveal your personal biases than to critique Hon. Chastanet.
“You oppose the idea that Chastanet seeks to empower our people, preferring instead that they remain reliant on what you perceive as massa. This outdated mindset is not what our nation needs. We must encourage an empowered citizenry, capable of independent thought and action, which you, along with your party, seem to fear.
“You are never too old to learn, Mr. George. When you point one finger, there are three pointing back at you. Your vitriol tells us more about your own ‘shriveled soul, chained by the bonds of wickedness, hatred, and jealousy’ than about those you accuse.”
Modestus Louis
April 13, 2024
07
of 07The Bigger Picture
Louis’s response to George’s comments not only defends Chastanet but also serves as a warning against the dangers of racially inflammatory rhetoric in political discourse. This controversy serves as a moment of reflection for the nation, challenging politicians and citizens alike to evaluate the impact of divisive language and its role in shaping the future of Saint Lucian politics.
As the public debate continues, observers are watching closely to see whether George will respond, and if this incident will have any impact on the SLP’s standing with the electorate.
Continue following Unitedpac St. Lucia News for more breaking news, political updates, and in-depth analysis on the issues shaping our nation.
Your first line in your article is fraud as Mr. Louis was and has never been a high ranking police officer in the Royal Dt. Lucia Police Force. He was a police Constable at the time of his retirement.
Is that all you deduced from the entire article? Could you clarify the actions of the SLP member mentioned, as described in the article? Additionally, considering the discussion of high-ranking officials, how do you reconcile the appointment of the current Minister of Crime Prevention, who previously served as a Police Constable and reportedly has a checkered record?
The best PR for any and every member of Parliament is their conduct and productivity. It is only when these don’t hold up to public scrutiny that these MPs resort to the media and other gimmicks in an attempt to dupe the public into supporting them.