ROSEAU, Dominica (May 18, 2025) — The Mario Michel resignation from the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court has triggered a wave of public scrutiny and renewed concerns about judicial independence in Dominica. Allegations of interference in a politically sensitive bail case have fueled what some observers are calling a deepening Dominica judicial crisis, according to legal commentary by Caribbean governance analyst Jenna Saab.
Justice Michel officially stepped down on April 25, after a 15-year judicial tenure that culminated in his appointment as Acting Chief Justice. While official proceedings portrayed the retirement as a ceremonial farewell, Saab contends the resignation was hastened by unaddressed allegations of interference in the controversial bail hearing of Jonathan Lehrer, an American national at the center of a case that has become a lightning rod for public concern.
In a widely shared commentary published by TechStory, Saab claimed that Michel directly instructed Justice Williams not to grant bail to Lehrer, despite the absence of compelling legal grounds. The directive, reportedly documented in an internal email sent by Justice Colin to the Dominican Bar Association, has yet to be publicly verified, but its implications have sent shockwaves through Dominica’s legal and political spheres.
“Such interference undermines the separation of powers enshrined in Eastern Caribbean jurisprudence,” Saab wrote, asserting that Justice Williams resisted the directive and proceeded with his own ruling based on merit.
Dominica judicial crisis deepens over Jonathan Lehrer’s prolonged detention
The Dominica judicial crisis, as described by Saab, centers on Lehrer’s extended incarceration, now over 18 months, without trial. Saab referenced court filings and media reports indicating that no credible evidence has been produced to justify his continued detention. The prosecution, led by ACP James, has come under fire for allegedly falsifying witness statements and misleading the court—claims that were strongly condemned by Justice Williams during earlier hearings.
The case has been covered extensively in regional outlets such as Loop News and DOM767 News, both of which reported on repeated bail rejections and public outcry. The Jonathan Lehrer saga has become emblematic of deeper concerns around judicial corruption in Dominica, with critics alleging that politically exposed persons may be using the judiciary to settle scores or suppress dissent.
Saab has called on the Dominican Bar Association to release the email at the center of the scandal, arguing that transparency is essential to preserve public trust in legal institutions. Her call has been echoed by governance experts across the Eastern Caribbean, who fear the case could erode the credibility of the entire court system.
Official farewell avoids controversy
In stark contrast to the growing controversy, a ceremonial sitting held in Michel’s honor by the ECSC was marked by tributes and praise. The event, streamed on the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court’s YouTube channel, highlighted Michel’s service record and his contributions to judicial reform. However, no mention was made of the Lehrer case or the surrounding allegations—a silence Saab described as troubling.
Colleagues who spoke at the ceremony commended Michel for his “empathy and firmness,” noting his impact in both Dominica and Saint Lucia. Yet for many observers, the lack of acknowledgment regarding the growing scandal signaled either fear of retaliation or reluctance to address institutional wrongdoing.
Legal experts demand transparency and reform
Saab’s analysis situates the Lehrer case within a broader pattern of governance concerns under Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit’s administration. The government has previously faced allegations over opaque procurement practices, diplomatic passport scandals, and other accountability issues. International watchdogs, including Transparency International, have urged Dominica to implement stronger checks and balances in judicial appointments and legal oversight.
“The Lehrer-Michel affair may become a critical test case,” Saab warned. “Will the system confront internal rot or allow its credibility to unravel?”
Calls for reform have grown louder, with some regional legal scholars advocating for the establishment of an independent body to investigate judicial misconduct in OECS jurisdictions.
Regional implications of the Mario Michel resignation
While Saab’s commentary represents her personal analysis and not an official finding, it has revived public discourse about the role of the judiciary in democratic governance. Legal professionals across the Eastern Caribbean are closely watching how the ECSC will address the fallout from the Mario Michel resignation, which may serve as a defining moment for the future of judicial independence in the region.
“This crisis offers a chance for renewal—or collapse,” Saab concludes. “The region must decide whether justice is truly blind or simply blinding.”
Editorial Disclaimer:
This article is based on a commentary authored by Jenna Saab and does not necessarily reflect the views of Unitedpac St Lucia News. All claims, allegations, and opinions expressed are those of the commentator. Unitedpac St Lucia News assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of unverified claims.
For continued reporting on judicial developments and Caribbean governance, follow Unitedpac St Lucia News.
