PORT OF SPAIN, Trinidad and Tobago — Trinidad and Tobago EU tax list status has been cleared after the European Union’s Economic and Financial Affairs Council voted on Feb. 17, 2026, to remove the country from the bloc’s list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. EU officials said the delisting followed reforms that brought Trinidad and Tobago into line with internationally agreed standards on tax good governance.

The EU list is intended to support global efforts to curb tax evasion and avoidance risks, strengthen transparency, and promote fair taxation. For jurisdictions placed on the list, the designation can trigger increased scrutiny in cross-border transactions and reputational risk for companies and financial institutions that rely on international compliance screening.
EU Ambassador to Trinidad and Tobago Cécile Tassin welcomed the decision and credited years of engagement on reforms, describing the country’s progress toward meeting the agreed standards as impressive, according to a European External Action Service statement. She said the outcome was a positive sign for the continued strengthening of the relationship between Trinidad and Tobago and the European Union.
What the delisting means for business and the economy
For Trinidad and Tobago, removal from the EU list is seen as a credibility signal that can matter to banks, investors, and international partners assessing regulatory risk. When a jurisdiction is listed, enhanced due diligence can become routine in financial services, including correspondent banking checks, transaction monitoring, and compliance reviews tied to corporate structures.
Trinidad and Tobago’s delisting comes as the country has faced other forms of external scrutiny in recent years, including UK strict visa rules on Trinidad and Tobago, underscoring how international policy decisions can shape travel, business, and investor confidence.
Local officials framed the delisting as a boost for confidence in Trinidad and Tobago’s regulatory and economic framework, arguing that meeting the EU criteria reinforces the country’s reputation as a cooperative international financial partner. The government also positioned the outcome as supportive of a broader push toward stable growth and stronger oversight standards.
How Trinidad and Tobago EU tax list issues were resolved
Trinidad and Tobago’s reform track centered on addressing areas flagged during the EU review process, including the country’s incentives regime and transparency benchmarks. A key step highlighted by officials was the replacement of the former Free Trade Zone framework, which had been assessed as harmful, with a Special Economic Zone structure designed to meet international requirements.
Authorities also pointed to progress on tax transparency and cooperation standards linked to information exchange between jurisdictions. Over the past two years, the government pursued alignment with international mechanisms that support the exchange of tax information on request and the automatic exchange of financial account information, which are treated as core indicators of compliance in modern tax governance.
Officials said Trinidad and Tobago also addressed recommendations under the OECD and G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, including improvements related to Country by Country reporting. That framework is aimed at reducing profit shifting by multinational companies and strengthening the ability of tax authorities to assess risk across borders.
Government statements described the EU decision as the culmination of a multi-year reform agenda, arguing that it demonstrates the practical value of sustained international cooperation on regulatory standards.
Prime Minister points to broader progress in Facebook reaction
Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar addressed the delisting in a Facebook post, describing it as one of several developments she attributed to the UNC being in government. In the same statement, she cited other items she described as positive indicators, including approvals related to OFAC licensing, a favourable IMF report, interest connected to the Blueprint Revitalization plan, and demand signals tied to international financing activity and investor attention in the energy sector.
Her post also included sharp criticism of the opposition People’s National Movement and made allegations presented as political claims. Those assertions were not supported with evidence in the post, and they were not part of the EU’s explanation for delisting, which focused on technical compliance with tax governance standards.





























